Independent Joe Might Support Republican in ‘08
by Pamela LeaveyJoe Lieberman said today on FOX News Sunday, that he plans to flex his Independent muscles in ‘08 and could possibly support a Republican for president. The news shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone at this point. I’m wondering if he’s hoping good buddy John McCain might give him the VP nod. McCain if he won the nomination would be a fool to pick Joe as VP.
“I’m going to do what most independents and a lot of Democrats and Republicans in America do, which is to take a look at all the candidates and then in the end, regardless of party, decide who I think will be best for the future of our country,” Lieberman said Sunday.
“So I’m open to supporting a Democrat, Republican or even an Independent, if there’s a strong one. Stay tuned,” said the three-term lawmaker who caucuses with Senate Democrats.
Lieberman is an ally of GOP Sen. John McCain of Arizona, a 2008 hopeful, and supports President Bush’s new Iraq strategy. Lieberman won re-election as an independent last fall when Democrats backed an anti-war candidate who won the party primary.
Speaking of which politician he may support in 2008, Lieberman said, “Obviously, the positions that some candidates have taken in Iraq troubles me. Obviously, I will be looking at what positions they take in the larger war against Islamist terrorism.”He added, “I am genuinely an independent. I agree more often than not with Democrats on domestic policy. I agree more often than not with Republicans on foreign and defense policy.”
The senator said he wanted to select someone “I believe is best for the future of our country. … Party is important, but more important is the national interest. And that’s the basis that I will decide whom to support for president.”
Crooks and Liars has more and video here.
Filed under: Election '08, In The News, Iraq, Politics, Republicans | Get Permalink or trackback |




Are you surprised, this guy is a dino. The people of Conn. are stupid for trusting this guy.
Given his support for vouchers, laisezz-faire trade policies, and his reluctance to attack Enron, I’m wondering just how often he actually agrees with Dems on domestic policy.