| Home | About Us | Login/Register | Email News Tips |

A liberal dose of news, national and local politics, commentary, opinions and common sense conversation…

John Kerry Lays Out Health Care Plan, Calls for Universal Health Care Coverage by 2012

by Pamela Leavey

In a speech today at Boston’s Faneuil Hall, Senator John Kerry put forth his comprehensive health care plan, which lowers the cost of and improves quality of health care, covers every child in America, and ensures that every American has access to the same type of health care that members of Congress give themselves.

Kerry’s plan will guarantee that every American has health insurance by 2012.

A fact sheet on Kerry’s plan is available here. Below are John Kerry’s remarks as prepared for delivery:

“Health Care for All Americans”
Senator John Kerry
July 31, 2006
Faneuil Hall, Boston, Massachusetts

Faneuil Hall, as you know, is more than an historic building. This birthplace of American freedom has also been a keeper of the American conscience. Here, where we gather today, abolitionists dreamed of and demanded a nation that would live out its founding ideal that all are created equal. From the fight for women’s suffrage to the fight against Fascism, from McCarthyism to civil rights to Vietnam, these walls have rung with words of honor, dissent, courage, and principle.

We strive to live up to that heritage even if we sometimes fall short. Each time I come here, I feel that obligation and that privilege.

This is the place where I began my presidential campaign—and the place where I ended it almost two years ago. But I said then that we had “to make a difference… to stand true to our best hopes and ideals.”

And since then I have returned to Faneuil Hall to speak the truth that the Iraq War was rooted in deception and waged with self-deception—that saving lives is more important than saving face—that we must offer the leadership that makes America more secure and brings our forces home from the wrong war in the wrong place at the wrong time.

I have returned here also to bear witness to the ideal that dissent is not a threat to– but the very safeguard of — democracy—that it is right to stand up to a President who ignores the Constitution and Vice President who acts as if he had never read it—to insist that our leaders are strongest when they believe the future belongs not to fear but to freedom; and that America is strongest when we don’t just permit free speech, but we listen to it.

Last month here in the cradle of American independence, I joined you to set out a strategy to make America energy independent– to propose specific steps for an energy revolution as far-reaching as the industrial revolution. And to oppose the procrastination, the Washington evasion and the Cheney-run secret task forces by and for big oil.

Now, today, I return to discuss health care—which is not only the great unfinished business of half a century, but a matter of fundamental moral values. I would remind those who invoke values for their own narrow political purposes that the Scriptures do not command us to “heal the sick” only if they have the money to pay for it.

And I would remind my fellow Democrats that our party will be hollow in purpose, expedient and short-sighted until we renew–and finally win –the battle to make health care a right and not a privilege for every American.

For five decades, Presidents have approached this challenge and then backed away— and powerful interests have had their way. As Democrats, we have to take up the cause and refuse to back down. We can’t triangulate this issue; no, we have to go to the heart of it— affordable health care for every American.

Today I will set out a health care plan that I believe must be a centerpiece of our purpose and promise to the nation. Here are the goals and principles of this plan:

  • ONE – Every American, and I mean everybody, must have health coverage by 2012.
  • TWO – To get there, we start with kids first. They’re born, they’re enrolled in health care. They go to child care, they’re enrolled. They go to school, they’re enrolled. No “ifs,” “ands,” or “buts,” every child gets health care – automatically, immediately, every child in America gets health care now.
  • THIRD – We must and will control the skyrocketing premiums, co-pays, and exclusions that make a mockery of the insurance hard-working families pay for month after month. No longer will families be pushed into bankruptcy by medical bills they can’t pay —no longer will sons and daughters have to choose between paying for a doctor’s bill for one child or college tuition for another – it is time to finally guarantee that as health care costs are held down, Americans get the health care they need and deserve.
  • FOURTH – and finally, instead of telling tens of millions to wait until they are sick enough to go to an emergency room, we must and will assure high quality and preventive care for every American.

Now this is not a new issue for me. It’s not the flavor of the month. During the 2004 Presidential campaign, I fought for a comprehensive health care proposal aimed at dealing simultaneously with escalating costs, eroding coverage, and erratic quality. One of my biggest regrets is that the fear talk trumped the health care walk and that we are less safe abroad and less healthy at home because of that.

Two years later this president and his party still have nothing to offer on health care other than a Medicare prescription drug plan that has turned out to be an unfolding disaster for seniors and a massive give-away to the big drug companies. Every single day since Election Day, the health care crisis has grown steadily worse. The President has stuck to his guns—or more accurately, his empty holster—and done nothing beyond trotting out the conservative hobby-horse of health savings accounts. Well let me tell you, Americans whose wages have shrunk so they can’t save at all, need more than the empty promise of an account they can never create with money they can’t save for health care they can’t afford.

So, I’m sticking to my guns as well. It is time to jump-start a debate around the country that can shake Washington into action before the health care crisis devastates millions more of America’s families—and hollows out America’s economy.

We can no longer accept a twentieth-century health care system for a twenty-first century economy. The roots of our current system are planted in the mid-twentieth-century idea that most working Americans will get health care benefits from a large company that employs them for decades, or perhaps for a lifetime.

But today, lifetime employment with one company has become the exception not the rule. Businesses are operating in a global marketplace in which their competitors don’t carry the health care burden. And thanks to the health care cost spiral in our country, that burden is growing heavier every day.

I reject the Hobson’s choice – the false choice– between putting companies out of business and workers out of jobs—or leaving more and more Americans without health insurance. With the right leadership, we can have both. We can guarantee health coverage and grow jobs, wages, and our economy.

Two corporations show the dangerous path ahead for employer-based health coverage. One used to be the largest company in the world—General Motors. The other is the largest company today—Wal-Mart.

As General Motors goes, people used to say, so goes the country. Well today, General Motors is weighed down with so many health care costs that it’s been called “an HMO dressed up as an auto company.” GM adds $1,500 to the cost of every car and truck it produces just to pay for health care for its workers. To give you an idea of how much this affects American businesses in the global marketplace, Toyota pays only $500 in health care costs per vehicle.

Now this isn’t just a problem for manufacturing industries. The CEO of Starbucks, Howard Shultz, said his company spends more on health care than coffee beans. They’re trying to do the right thing, but the people running our country aren’t doing the right thing by them.

Companies like Wal-Mart have adopted a totally different strategy—use workers until they get sick, don’t cover them for check-ups, and then tell them they’re on their own. The nice person who greets you at Wal-Mart’s door is shown the door when illness strikes. Whether it’s because Wal-Mart hires part-time workers and doesn’t offer them insurance, or offers health care packages most workers there can’t possibly afford, passing along enormous costs to families and taxpayers, the bottom line is clear: at Wal-Mart, less than forty percent of the employees have health insurance. That’s 600,000 working Americans on their own. It’s unconscionable and it is unacceptable that five of the ten richest people in America are Wal-Mart stockholders from the same family—worth double-digit billions each–but they can’t find the money to secure health coverage for their own workers and their families.

Wal-Mart workers aren’t alone. Millions of Americans with full-time jobs end up without health insurance. No family should be left with their fingers crossed, hoping to dodge a bullet, afraid that bad news from their doctor will leave them bankrupt or without care.

America believes in real family values and lives them; this Administration just talks about family values but does little to actually value families. Think about it: 46 million Americans uninsured including eleven million children, six million more than when this president took office. Those six million are casualties of indifference and incompetence every bit as much as the hundreds of people who are losing their lives in Iraq every week. And to demand change we must resolve to take both of these moral issues to the ballot box this fall.

Now the administration’s answer to millions without health care is: “they’re lucky just to have a low-paying job.” And the Administration’s answer to businesses trying to do the right thing is to tell them, in effect, go do what Wal-Mart is doing.

In the five Bush years, health insurance premiums have gone up 73 percent; reverse the numbers now and you have President’s Bush’s approval ratings.

Health care for a family of four now costs more than all the money that a minimum wage worker earns in a year. Still, we spend more on health care than any other country. But what are we buying? I’m not satisfied to see this nation slip to forty-eighth worldwide in life expectancy—lower than Bosnia or Jordan. If Donald Rumsfeld’s Pentagon can brag that 98% of Iraqi children have been immunized, we have a right to demand a government that can say the same about all America’s children

Today more and more working Americans, who run our small businesses, build our houses, bag our groceries, and care for our elderly are uninsured—or underinsured—under this administration’s watch.

If we don’t speak for them, who will?

The number of families declaring bankruptcy because of a serious illness is twenty times higher today than it was just twenty years ago.

If we don’t fight for them, who will?

Medical debts have become the single leading cause of bankruptcy in America today.

If we don’t change this, who will?

I’ll tell you who won’t: George Bush and his Republican Congress, which is why we can start by changing Congress this fall.

What we’re really seeing with health care today is a slow-motion Katrina that’s ruining lives and bankrupting families all over the country. Our hearts broke when we saw the elderly, children, the desperate and the dispossessed stranded on rooftops as the waters of Katrina rose around them. But too little has been said and done about millions of Americans across the country left behind as the medical bills pile up, and thousands of Americans dying from illnesses they could have beaten with the better preventative care that comes with good health insurance. Just as we learned in New Orleans, when it comes to health care, Washington is not ‘doing a heck of a job.’

And as with Hurricane Katrina, our health care crisis is an unmistakable message that we have not lived up to the first principle of the Declaration of Independence, that all are created equal. We must confront the unacceptable apartheid of health care in America. Today in America, black children are five times more likely than white children to die of asthma; Acceptable? No. African Americans 70% more likely to have diabetes and 27% more likely to die from it. Acceptable? No. And 80% more likely to die of prostate cancer—the disease that took my father, and Tom Farrington’s father, the disease that we have the medical science and moral obligation to prevent, detect, and treat so that it no longer robs sons and daughters and wives of their fathers and husbands and loved ones. Just as the doctrine of ‘separate but equal,’ was wrong in education, it’s wrong in health care: we have to reform the system so that the quality of health care for every American never again depends on the color any American’s skin.

To get there we must tackle three major challenges—spiraling costs, shrinking coverage, and uneven quality.

But we can’t meet that challenge if Washington just tinkers with one little problem or another, timidly one at a time, when what we need is a new and comprehensive national health strategy. We can’t accept a Washington trapped in so-called solutions that are cynically designed to get through the next election by ignoring the needs of the next generation.

Every time their pollsters warn the Republicans that their indifference to the health care crisis is beginning to displace other examples of administration incompetence and misgovernment as threats to their power– guess what?– the White House goes back to the same old rightwing propaganda machines posing as think tanks and proposes Health Savings Accounts.

Health Savings Account, my friends, are a fraud – another tax cut for the wealthy few – that would do little for the many who lack insurance and could reduce the value of benefits and raise costs for the majority who have it. Rarely has this administration’s commitment to a go-it-alone, you’re-on-your-own ideology of indifference been more transparent. If George W. Bush’s do-nothing Congress ever passes his half-baked answer to the health care crisis, believe me, it’ll be time to dust off his banner reading “Mission Accomplished.” And guess what – it’ll mean even less this time than it did before.

The ideologues running Washington today consistently manage to come up with “medicine” for our health care system that never cures the real problems but always protects the profits of insurance and pharmaceutical companies that do so much to finance Republican campaigns. Make no mistake—some of the administration’s ideas are snake oil, utterly phony. Others are castor oil, worse than the disease. But maybe snake oil and castor oil are the best we can expect from an administration led by two former oil executives.

Every American knows there are plenty of ways to get a handle on health care reform, but here’s a fact: this administration is no more interested in fixing health care than it is in finding the real truth about Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq—or establishing real accountability for the mass destruction of New Orleans.

Meanwhile, there are some in my own party who say we don’t have the power to pass legislation anyway and don’t have the platform to out-shout the special interests. They propose baby steps to solve a giant crisis. Or they fear to take up the cause because they know the political risks. Well I don’t believe we have to choose between doing too little, downplaying the issue—or fighting for a complex plan that would discard wholesale both the good and the bad of today’s health care system. I know we are smart enough to fix health care if we are brave enough to try.

Yes, health care is a complex issue but we Americans have had the ingenuity to eradicate small pox, create a mechanical heart, and map the human genome. Surely, if Americans can dream up the most miraculous cures for the most devastating illnesses we can make certain that none of our people ever again die because they can’t afford the treatments and the doctors that are right down the street. The Democratic Party must stand for health care for all Americans—or we don’t stand for anything at all.

The proposal I will advance today—and continue to fight for this year and next year—lives up to that challenge in a sensible, practical, comprehensive way that will cover all Americans with better quality at lower costs by 2012.

The first step toward a twenty-first century health care system is to contain the increasing financial burden on employers, small businesses, and middle-class families.

This requires investments in cutting-edge health information technology, investments that will save more than they cost.

The current system forces too many people go to too many different doctors to get too many different prescriptions and too many different tests with their information scattered on too many different health records. This is time-consuming, health-endangering, and money-wasting.

To end the fragmentation of care we must improve coordination and implement electronic records for all—and we must do it now.

We must provide new incentives for physicians to join group practices so we can achieve lower costs, reform management practices, and improve health outcomes with shorter wait times, and more time spent with a doctor.

We must create public-private partnerships to fund research on the comparative effectiveness of drugs and therapies so that care is decided on the basis of evidence, not because a company has the slickest ads or salesmen. The truth is, drug companies should be investing in cures, not commercials.

And patients should never be given a prescription drug just because a corporation gives a doctor a meal, a trip, or a financial bonus.

We can and must lower costs through a new federal reinsurance plan for catastrophic care. Now, reinsurance may be one of the big words I get a bad rap for, but reinsurance is a common-sense concept. Let me just say a word about it:

Today, the high costs of treating the sickest patients are driving up the price tag for everyone else and taking a huge toll on our businesses. Just one percent of the population accounted for over 20% of health care expenses in 2002. The bottom half of all claims accounted for just three percent of all health care expenses.

So to help our businesses get out from under the heavy financial burden of these expensive cases that hike up everyone’s premiums, the federal government ought to make a new deal with employers and health insurers. Here’s the deal: we will reimburse a percentage of the highest cost cases if you include preventative care and health promotion benefits in your plan and implement practices proven to make care affordable. This means lower costs and lower premiums for both employers and employees.

So reinsurance is a big word, but—you know what? It’s also a big idea.

The second part of my health care plan is fundamental: every American should have health coverage – and we will start by seeing to it that every child in this country is covered without equivocation, bureaucratic excess or endless delay. It’s simply wrong that the wealthiest country in the world leaves eleven million children without coverage—with no care, inadequate care, or care that comes too late.

You want a test of family values to take out to the heartland? Here’s a test: Instead of people earning a million dollars a year getting another tax cut, every child gets health care.

The first bill I introduced when I returned to the Senate after the Presidential campaign was called Kids First: it calls for a federal-state partnership to mandate health coverage to every child in America.

The proposal makes the states an offer they can’t refuse.

The federal government will pay for the most expensive part: enrolling all low-income children in Medicaid, automatically. The states will pay to expand coverage to higher income children. The result? Massachusetts will save more than $219 million annually – funding that can offset the costs of implementing the new state-based universal coverage plan. In the end, states across the country will save more than $6 billion a year, and every child will have health care. That’s good economics —and let me tell you something else, it’s good values too.

Beyond this, to achieve universal coverage nationwide, we must break out of the old and narrow debates, focus on new and creative solutions, and build on what works.

As we cover kids first, we should also assure something else that is both basic and fair: every American should be able to buy into the same kind of health care plan members of Congress give themselves today. Every American should benefit from a plan that offers high-quality choices of insurance options, and purchasing power. To make sure this is a real possibility and not an empty promise, we need targeted tax credits for middle-class families, single adults, small businesses, and near-retirees. Coverage must be provided for low-income families by enrolling them in the same program that covers their children.

This approach is flexible; it’s affordable; and it doesn’t shut anyone out or overcharge anyone because of their age or health. And it’s optional: nothing would prevent you from keeping the health plan you have now if you like it better.

Finally, after we’ve done all this, we need a backup. What we understand—and what this administration has failed to grasp time and again from Iraq to Katrina —is that hoping for the best is not the same as having a plan.

Experts—some of them here today—believe that my plan will provide coverage for all Americans by 2012. But if we’re not there by 2012, we will require that all Americans have health insurance, with the federal government guaranteeing they have the means to afford it.

Here in Massachusetts, we are trying out a new universal health plan built on individual and shared responsibility. If you want to drive in this state, you need auto insurance. And very soon, if you want to live in Massachusetts, you’ll have to have health insurance. So long as all Americans can afford coverage, it’s reasonable to ask them to take advantage of it, instead of asking the government to cover them when they show up in hospital emergency rooms.

Massachusetts is showing America how to take the initiative, break the gridlock, and confront this issue head-on. More than any single public leader in our country, for forty years, through Democratic and Republican Administrations, day in and day out, the senior Senator from our state–my friend–Ted Kennedy has led the legislative fight and commanded the conscience of our nation in urging universal health care. Here at home, Democratic legislators fought for reform for years, none more so than Sal DiMasi and Robert Travaglini, and in Mitt Romney they found a Republican Governor who helped them make reform a reality. Unfortunately, in Washington, we haven’t found that kind of bipartisan cooperation from the Bush Administration.

If we did, it wouldn’t be hard to see that controlling costs and expanding coverage are critical elements of a solution to the health care crisis – and that the health of all Americans—not the interests of the few—must be our goal.: Patients, not profits, first.

But today, our current health system places too much focus on the bottom line and not enough on the lives and health of millions of Americans. Improving the quality of care not only saves us money; it saves lives. As many as 1.5 million people get sick, are injured or die every year as a result of medical errors. The quality standard in other industries is just 4 errors per million. In health care, the standard is 100,000 errors per million. That’s extraordinary. We should not have a higher quality standard for the production of cars than we do for the protection of the sick.

Our hardworking health professionals—our doctors, our nurses, our hospital employees—would agree: it’s unacceptable and we need to fix the system to cut down on errors.

In 1993, Boston’s Brigham and Women’s Hospital was one of the first in the country to implement an electronic prescription system called Computer Physician Order Entry. It should be the model for the whole nation– digitized, private medical records, for prescriptions, treatment, and it must become a national priority and an everyday practice in every medical facility in America.

We must be determined as a nation to invest in this vision – and our investment must be real. Unfortunately, President Bush’s $116 million for Health Information Technology is a mere token, a tiny down payment on what is needed– less than half of what we spend each day on the war in Iraq. We need a real commitment to quality improvements to save lives in America. This is not something that can be done halfway. We have to invest now to save billions down the road.

So that brings us to the last question: How will we pay to transform our health care system? Well, you can’t play games with this one. Here’s the best way: It is time to roll back this President’s unaffordable tax cuts for the very wealthiest, those of us who make more than $200,000 a year. And the bottom line is: I don’t need a tax cut more than 46 million Americans need health care coverage.

No one should forget that back in the 1990s, before the big Bush tax cuts, our economy created vast new wealth, tens of thousands of millionaires, and indeed, the first mass upper-middle-class in human history. Who wouldn’t trade the economy we have today for the growth and progress of the 1990’s? Instead, believe me, if we don’t get a handle on health care and energy costs, we are headed straight back to the “stagflation” of the seventies, with its skyrocketing prices and interest rates, and ultimately, double-digit unemployment. And our businesses will lose their ability to compete internationally, precisely when globalization has made the competitive challenge a matter of national resources and economic preeminence.

I’m happy to say that over twenty major organizations have endorsed my Kids First health care plan alone, but unfortunately not a single Republican Senator has stepped up to the challenge.

Americans have a choice here: in 2006, if the Congress won’t fix health care, then Americans can fix the Congress.

Some have suggested that I offer a new health care plan so it can sound new. What I put forward in 2004 works. It was a good plan then, and it’s a good plan now. I’m not willing to give up that fight. What we need is a new Congress this year and a new president in 2008 to make sure we finish the job. Let’s stand together to cure what ails this country – to give America back its future and the truth – and to secure the basic right of health coverage for every American.

See also: Quotes on John Kerry’s Health Care Plan

13 Responses to “John Kerry Lays Out Health Care Plan, Calls for Universal Health Care Coverage by 2012”

  1. […] formation adds condition-specific mini-sites. (PRWEB Jul 25, 2006) Trackback URI: … John Kerry Lays Out Health Care Plan, Calls for Universal Health <b>…</b> Kerrys pla […]

  2. […] formation adds condition-specific mini-sites. (PRWEB Jul 25, 2006) Trackback URI: … John Kerry Lays Out Health Care Plan, Calls for Universal Health <b>…</b> Kerrys pla […]

  3. Excellent points from John Kerry. I argee health care is important. When people are more healhier the morale is higher and workers would work better, therefore, chain reaction of betterment spreads. There is medical exploration and much development in the architecture woods in our body. Who says we can’t live to 200 years old? and Why not? If we armor ourselves with better health intelligence to maneuver enhanced healing and truly build a fountain of youth, that has been so evasive and mysterious, for life is close to discovering the face of God. Why can’t caring for better life reinforcement or medicine be art? A new art? Without a mechanical heart, Dick Cheney wouldn’t be able to be in the position of power he is in. Aol president, Steve Case mentioned his case of incubating the entire nation upon a new “McDonald” verison of “fast food” in health installment. Meaning, maybe, in every commerical corner there would be a daily marketplace for potent portions of medicine that is almost licensed to be homemade and mystic, but is developed in a hearted assembly line, producing health enhancing biscuits, instead of big macs. Mass farming and growing those medicine could be the new welfare industry.

    John Kerry is clearly the best leader to ride on that historic crusade to revolutionize our health through better health care as if to touch the finger of god, that sleeps in our unconscious mind and desires.
    Better to have the power to heal than have the power to destruct? Healing is far more powerful and complicated than simple and sheer destruction. Every decades, something new awakes. I may not be a 5 star expert, but I vouch that we better start something good before it is all too late. I give my vote to the bearer of the purple star. Anyone who truly vouches for health care from the health and for better creative developments in the welfare or charity flocks walks with Jesus.

  4. Massachusetts has rolled out a universal health care program. This state recognized that to make any program workable, EVERYBODY must be enrolled including those who don’t need it right away like the young and healthy.

    I agree that Bush paid off the pharmaceutical companies for their payments to his election campaigns by messing up Medicare Part D and every decision this admin has made with regard to health care has to be viewed in that light.


  5. “And very soon, if you want to live in Massachusetts, you’ll have to have health insurance. ”

    Doesn’t this violate our constitutional rights to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness? So how do they enforce this? We have to carry our Health insurance ID card around to prove we are insured? Is the penalty to be deported from Massachusetts or to be executed? Sounds like facsism to me!

  6. Kerry is simply sounding out a variation on a very tired theme. This platform is based on oughts, shoulds and woulds. It does not speak to the financial underpinnings which will be required.

    Quite honetly, after 25 years of working within the hospitals of the U.S., I do not think that any type of new wrinkle an an old broken, fractured and terribly leaky non-system system is going to fly.

    It’s time to federally regulate all healthcare and healthcare reimbursement in the U.S.. It’s time to place incentives for achieving and maintaining healthy states. hewalthcare must become independent from employment and employers.

    When it becomes easier to do the right thing – whether it’s taking personal responsibility and authority for own’s own health, or providing equal access to all for needed health care services, then we’ll see real and measurable progress.

    Right now, institutional health care is provided on the stopped backs of professional nurses, and it’s controlled by bottomline profit driven administrators and physicians. The care has gone out of the nurse-patient and physician-patient relationship. Instead, it’s been replaced by providing the most accurate and fastest diagnosis and the most intense delivery of high tech care. The person has been left by the wayside.

    If nurses ever wake up and come to consensus with the realization that it’s they who hold the success of the extant broken system in their hands, revolution will shortly follow.

    It’s a nurse who is with the mother at the time of delivery and escorts new life into the world, the one who escorts the person out of this life at the time of death, and who provides the expert care to save lives, empowers others to be able to take responsibility for their health choices, and empowers others to remain as independent as possible while navigating a byzantine health services and reimbursement maze. When nurses finally say “enough!” and demnad the ability to truly nurse the person again, instead of managing equipment, there will be a sea change.

    I’m looking forward to that tsunami.

  7. Bryan,

    I’m not familiar with all the details of the MA plan, but one good thing about Kerry’s plan is the voluntary nature of it. If you are happy with your current coverage (or want no coverage) it doesn’t impose regulations on you. However, many would choose to take advantages of his proposals to make health care more affordable.

    As for the MA plan, while I don’t know the specifics I feel it is safe to say there will be no deportations or executions. Requiring health insurance hardly matches the horrors seen under true facisism.

  8. Hey Bryan,

    Here is some info on the Mass plan – http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/04/AR2006040401937.html. It recognizes those who do not have insurance because they cannot afford it end up being paid for by either the state OR by those who have insurance thru higher prices they pay.

    If the state pays, it means higher taxes anyway and I like the analogy of cars being required to have insurance so why not require people to have health insurance. If people don’t have insurance, they don’t go to the doc when they need it and it can put all of us at risk. Look this is a first and we need to see how it works.

    Check out New Hampshire -http://www.nhhealthplan.org/ – for its plan. See Vermont – http://www.dsw.state.vt.us/Programs_Pages/Healthcare/vhap.htm.

    Let’s not go over the deep end here saying that Massachusetts is a Fascit state for requiring all to have health insurance. A fascist state is characterized by a dictator and this law was enacted by the state legislator voting with the input of the people – not by a dictator!


  9. Vi

    Thanks for the links! Having grown up in MA and lived there for 33 years the notion that MA is facist is ridiculous.

  10. John Kerry hits the nail on the head. Healthcare in this country is expensive because so many are left out of the system, drug costs are in the stratosphere, and the system as a whole is run in a manner that is penny wise but pound foolish. I was an RN for over 20 years and worked in all kinds of settings and I’m glad I’m out. I know first hand how hospitals resist any kind of change if it thinks it will cost money. That’s why many changes that could reduce errors, errors that end up COSTING money, aren’t implemented. I like that everybody must participate. There are those who think since they’re young and healthy they don’t need it, so of course it’s the state that’s left to pick up the tab if they’re injured in a car wreck. and if God forbid they end up totally FUBAR those costs will run into the MILLIONS. Dubya and the republicans are always spouting off about the cost to small buisnesses if they do something like raise the minimum wage.If they really gave a damn about the small buisness they would have done something to relieve the healthcare burden. When companies like GM start feeling the pinch something needs to be done ASAP.

  11. Kerry Was On to Something and the Big Three Automakers Get It

    Last week when the Big Three automakers paid a call on George W Bush they wanted to talk about the woes of the auto industry. “Among their complaints,” Scott Lehigh notes in the Boston Globe, “The heavy healthcare costs they shoulder…

  12. […] ill certainly accept campaign contributions from the same companies that …Read more: here This entry was posted on Tuesday, November […]

  13. John Edwards Has A Health Care Plan

    On Monday, John Edwards laid out his universal health care plan that “would require everyone in the country to have health insurance by 2012, through private sources or one of several government-managed programs that he says should be expanded.&…